dinner: is nyc

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.66
, event
Weight: 0.64
, meal
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.61
Siblings thanksgiving
Weight: 0.63
, lunch
Weight: 0.63
, reception
Weight: 0.61
, brunch
Weight: 0.57
, breakfast
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is nyc 1.00
is jackson ms 0.78
is zz 0.76
be in rome 0.76
be such big thing in york 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dinner, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is jackson ms)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dinner, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(thanksgiving, be in rome)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dinner, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(brunch, be such big thing in york)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(dinner, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(lunch, is jackson ms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(lunch, is jackson ms)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(dinner, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(brunch, be such big thing in york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(brunch, be such big thing in york)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(dinner, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(thanksgiving, be in rome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(thanksgiving, be in rome)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(dinner, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(dinner, is nyc)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(dinner, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(dinner, is zz)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(dinner, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dinner, is zz)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(dinner, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(dinner, is zz)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dinner, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(dinner, is zz)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(dinner, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dinner, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dinner, is nyc)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(dinner, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dinner, is nyc)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dinner, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(brunch, be such big thing in york)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dinner, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lunch, is jackson ms)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dinner, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(thanksgiving, be in rome)