dinosaur: be considered reptiles

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.72
, creature
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.61
, reptile
Weight: 0.60
Siblings tyrannosaurus
Weight: 0.78
, raptor
Weight: 0.67
, fossil
Weight: 0.57
, lizard
Weight: 0.38
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered reptiles 1.00
is reptiles 0.97
be named reptiles 0.95
be classified as reptiles 0.94
be named prehistoric reptiles 0.89
be sized mammals reptiles nonexistent 0.86
be called lizards 0.85
is lizards 0.84
be belong reptile 0.84
be related to lizards 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(reptile, is reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(dinosaur, be considered reptiles)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(reptile, is reptiles)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(reptile, is reptiles)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(raptor, is reptiles)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(lizard, is reptiles)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(reptile, is reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(dinosaur, be considered reptiles)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(raptor, is reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(raptor, is reptiles)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(lizard, is reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(lizard, is reptiles)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(dinosaur, be considered reptiles)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(dinosaur, be belong reptile)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be related to lizards)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be belong reptile)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(dinosaur, be related to lizards)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dinosaur, be belong reptile)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(dinosaur, be belong reptile)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(dinosaur, be related to lizards)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(dinosaur, be related to lizards)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(dinosaur, be named prehistoric reptiles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be considered reptiles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(dinosaur, be considered reptiles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(reptile, is reptiles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(raptor, is reptiles)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(lizard, is reptiles)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(dinosaur, be considered reptiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(reptile, is reptiles)