director: be paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents executive
Weight: 0.77
, officer
Weight: 0.69
, supervisor
Weight: 0.69
, police officer
Weight: 0.67
Siblings president
Weight: 0.69
, secretary
Weight: 0.67
, producer
Weight: 0.63
, lee
Weight: 0.54
, harold pinter
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
be paid 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(police officer, be paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(director, be paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(director, be paid)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(police officer, be paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(director, be paid)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(police officer, be paid)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(director, be paid)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(director, be paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(director, be paid)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(director, be paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(director, be paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(director, be paid)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(director, be paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(director, be paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(director, be paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(director, be paid)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(police officer, be paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(director, be paid)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(police officer, be paid)