police officer: be paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents officer
Weight: 0.76
, police
Weight: 0.76
, public servant
Weight: 0.70
, investigator
Weight: 0.58
Siblings police car
Weight: 0.77
, police dog
Weight: 0.73
, security guard
Weight: 0.68
, sergeant
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be paid 1.00
get paid 0.97
get paid leave 0.90
get suspended with pay 0.77
pay tax 0.77
be suspended with pay 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(police officer, be paid)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(public servant, pay tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(police officer, be paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(officer, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(public servant, pay tax)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(public servant, pay tax)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(officer, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(security guard, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(police officer, be paid)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(public servant, pay tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(police officer, be paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(security guard, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(police officer, be paid)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(police officer, get paid)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, get paid)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(police officer, get paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(police officer, get paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(police officer, get suspended with pay)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(police officer, be suspended with pay)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(police officer, get suspended with pay)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(police officer, be suspended with pay)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(police officer, get suspended with pay)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(police officer, be suspended with pay)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(police officer, get suspended with pay)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be suspended with pay)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(police officer, be paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(officer, get paid)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(public servant, pay tax)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(security guard, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(officer, get paid)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(public servant, pay tax)