officer: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents police officer
Weight: 0.88
, employee
Weight: 0.68
, other person
Weight: 0.63
, official
Weight: 0.63
Siblings warrant officer
Weight: 0.77
, vice president
Weight: 0.74
, executive
Weight: 0.72
, chairman
Weight: 0.71
, inspector
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
be paid 0.97
is paid 0.96
get paid more 0.96
get paid leave 0.94
get paid little 0.93
is paid little 0.90
apparently get pay 0.83
apparently get special pay 0.82
apparently get less special pay 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(police officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(officer, get paid)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(officer, get paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(police officer, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(police officer, be paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be paid)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(police officer, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(executive, get paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(executive, is paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(police officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(officer, get paid)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(police officer, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(officer, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(executive, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(executive, get paid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(executive, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(executive, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(officer, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(officer, get paid more)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(officer, get paid more)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(officer, get paid more)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(officer, get paid more)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(officer, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(officer, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, get paid)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(police officer, be paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(executive, is paid)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(executive, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, get paid)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(police officer, be paid)