security guard: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents security system
Weight: 0.77
, employee
Weight: 0.69
, police officer
Weight: 0.68
, worker
Weight: 0.68
Siblings bouncer
Weight: 0.47
, prison guard
Weight: 0.37
, state police
Weight: 0.35
, police
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
is paid 0.96
get paid little 0.93
is paid little 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(police officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(security guard, get paid)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(security guard, get paid)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(security guard, get paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(worker, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(police officer, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(worker, is paid little)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(police officer, get paid)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(worker, is paid little)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(police officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(security guard, get paid)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(security guard, get paid)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(security guard, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(security guard, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(security guard, is paid)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(security guard, get paid little)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(security guard, get paid little)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(security guard, is paid little)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(security guard, get paid little)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(security guard, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(security guard, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(worker, is paid little)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(worker, get paid)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(worker, get paid)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(worker, is paid little)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(security guard, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, get paid)