worker: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.66
, person
Weight: 0.63
, poor people
Weight: 0.61
, supervisor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings construction worker
Weight: 0.88
, office worker
Weight: 0.81
, nurse
Weight: 0.71
, janitor
Weight: 0.71
, bus driver
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
is paid 0.96
get paid less 0.93
get paid little 0.93
get paid working 0.93
is paid little 0.90
be paid rate of pay 0.90
be are paid 0.89
be paid in system 0.88
be even are paid 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(janitor, get paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nurse, get paid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid little)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(nurse, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(nurse, get paid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(janitor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(janitor, get paid)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(construction worker, get paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid little)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(construction worker, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(worker, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(worker, get paid less)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(worker, get paid less)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(worker, get paid working)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(worker, get paid less)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid working)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid less)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(worker, is paid little)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(worker, get paid working)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(worker, is paid little)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(worker, be even are paid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(worker, get paid working)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(worker, be even are paid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(worker, is paid little)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(worker, is paid little)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(worker, be even are paid)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(worker, be even are paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(worker, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid little)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(nurse, get paid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(janitor, get paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)