construction worker: get paid

Related concepts

Parents	worker Weight: 0.88 , employee Weight: 0.74 , project Weight: 0.67 , contractor Weight: 0.64
Siblings	carpenter Weight: 0.70 , engineer Weight: 0.65 , roofer Weight: 0.63 , mason Weight: 0.63 , electrician Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property	Similarity
get paid	1.00
is paid	0.96
get paid little	0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(contractor, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(contractor, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(worker, get paid)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(contractor, get paid)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(contractor, is paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(electrician, is paid)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(electrician, get paid)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(carpenter, is paid)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(carpenter, get paid)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(carpenter, get paid little)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(contractor, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(contractor, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(carpenter, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(carpenter, get paid)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(electrician, get paid)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(carpenter, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(carpenter, get paid little)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(electrician, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(electrician, is paid)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(carpenter, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(carpenter, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(construction worker, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.90

Salient(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(construction worker, is paid)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.90

Salient(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(construction worker, get paid little)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid little)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid little)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(construction worker, is paid)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid little)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Salient(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(worker, get paid)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(contractor, get paid)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(contractor, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(carpenter, get paid little)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(carpenter, get paid)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(electrician, get paid)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(electrician, is paid)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(carpenter, is paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(worker, get paid)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(contractor, get paid)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(construction worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(contractor, is paid)