contractor: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction worker
Weight: 0.70
, workman
Weight: 0.63
, professional
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.61
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, engineer
Weight: 0.65
, builder
Weight: 0.63
, plumber
Weight: 0.63
, agent
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
is paid 0.96
get paid more 0.96
is paid more 0.93
be paid in cash 0.86
pay more taxes 0.78
pay less tax 0.78
pay taxes 0.77
earn more 0.77
pay tax 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(construction worker, is paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plumber, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(plumber, is paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(contractor, get paid)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(contractor, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(agent, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(agent, get paid)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(plumber, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(plumber, get paid)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(plumber, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(plumber, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(contractor, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(contractor, get paid more)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid more)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(contractor, is paid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(contractor, get paid more)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(contractor, is paid more)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(contractor, pay taxes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay taxes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(contractor, pay tax)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay taxes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay tax)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(contractor, is paid)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay tax)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid more)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid more)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid more)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(contractor, is paid more)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(contractor, pay less tax)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(contractor, pay taxes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(contractor, pay tax)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay less tax)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(contractor, earn more)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, pay less tax)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(contractor, earn more)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(contractor, earn more)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(contractor, earn more)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(plumber, get paid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(plumber, is paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(contractor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)