agent: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents biological agent
Weight: 0.76
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.65
, source
Weight: 0.64
, contractor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings travel agent
Weight: 0.75
, representative
Weight: 0.67
, beta blocker
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.63
, attorney
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
is paid 0.96
get paid more 0.96
is paid more 0.93
be paid in cash 0.86
be allowed pay 0.86
be paid more than employees 0.83
pay more taxes 0.78
pay less tax 0.78
pay taxes 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(real estate agent, is paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(real estate agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(contractor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(contractor, is paid more)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(contractor, get paid more)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, pay less tax)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(contractor, pay taxes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(contractor, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(contractor, get paid more)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(contractor, is paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay taxes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, is paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(contractor, is paid more)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay less tax)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(contractor, be paid more than employees)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay taxes)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is paid)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, get paid)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid more)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid more)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid more than employees)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, get paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be allowed pay)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(real estate agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(agent, get paid)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(real estate agent, is paid)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(agent, get paid)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(contractor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(agent, get paid)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(contractor, is paid)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(agent, get paid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(contractor, get paid more)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(agent, get paid)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(contractor, is paid more)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(agent, get paid)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(agent, get paid)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(contractor, be paid more than employees)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(agent, get paid)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, pay less tax)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(agent, get paid)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(agent, get paid)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(contractor, pay taxes)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(agent, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(travel agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(travel agent, get paid)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(attorney, be allowed pay)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(attorney, be allowed pay)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(agent, get paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid more)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(contractor, pay taxes)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(real estate agent, get paid)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid more)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(contractor, be paid more than employees)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, pay less tax)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is paid)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(contractor, be paid in cash)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(attorney, be allowed pay)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(travel agent, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid more)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(real estate agent, get paid)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid more)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is paid)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(contractor, pay taxes)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(contractor, be paid more than employees)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, pay less tax)