contractor: is paid more

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction worker
Weight: 0.70
, workman
Weight: 0.63
, professional
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.61
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, engineer
Weight: 0.65
, builder
Weight: 0.63
, plumber
Weight: 0.63
, agent
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid more 1.00
get paid more 0.97
is paid 0.95
get paid 0.93
be paid in cash 0.86
pay less tax 0.82
pay more taxes 0.81
earn more 0.79
pay taxes 0.76
pay tax 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid more)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid more)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(construction worker, is paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(plumber, is paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plumber, get paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(contractor, is paid more)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(contractor, is paid more)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(agent, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(agent, get paid)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(plumber, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(plumber, is paid)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(plumber, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(plumber, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(contractor, is paid more)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(contractor, get paid more)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(contractor, is paid)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(contractor, get paid)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid more)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(contractor, get paid more)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid more)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(contractor, pay less tax)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(contractor, is paid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(contractor, get paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(contractor, pay taxes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay taxes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay taxes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(contractor, pay tax)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay tax)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay tax)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(contractor, earn more)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay less tax)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(contractor, pay taxes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, pay less tax)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(contractor, pay tax)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(contractor, earn more)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(contractor, earn more)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(contractor, earn more)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid more)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid more)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(plumber, get paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(plumber, is paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(contractor, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)