contractor: be paid in cash

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction worker
Weight: 0.70
, workman
Weight: 0.63
, professional
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.61
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, engineer
Weight: 0.65
, builder
Weight: 0.63
, plumber
Weight: 0.63
, agent
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be paid in cash 1.00
is paid 0.88
prefer cash 0.87
get paid 0.86
is paid more 0.86
get paid more 0.85
prefer cash over credit card 0.82
make money 0.80
pay less tax 0.77
pay more taxes 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(construction worker, make money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(contractor, be paid in cash)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(construction worker, is paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(construction worker, make money)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, make money)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(plumber, is paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plumber, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(builder, prefer cash)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(architect, make money)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(plumber, make money)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(construction worker, make money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(builder, prefer cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(builder, prefer cash)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(plumber, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(plumber, is paid)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(agent, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(agent, get paid)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(plumber, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(plumber, get paid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(architect, make money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(architect, make money)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(plumber, make money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(plumber, make money)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(contractor, be paid in cash)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(contractor, prefer cash)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(contractor, prefer cash)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(contractor, prefer cash over credit card)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(contractor, is paid more)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contractor, get paid more)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(contractor, prefer cash over credit card)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(contractor, is paid)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(contractor, prefer cash over credit card)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(contractor, prefer cash)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(contractor, prefer cash over credit card)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(contractor, get paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(contractor, is paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(contractor, is paid more)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(contractor, get paid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(contractor, get paid more)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(contractor, get paid more)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(contractor, is paid more)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(contractor, make money)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(contractor, pay less tax)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(contractor, pay less tax)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(contractor, make money)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(contractor, prefer cash)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(contractor, pay less tax)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(contractor, make money)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay more taxes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay less tax)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is paid more)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(contractor, make money)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(contractor, get paid more)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(contractor, be paid in cash)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(construction worker, make money)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(architect, make money)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(builder, prefer cash)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(plumber, get paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(plumber, is paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plumber, make money)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(contractor, be paid in cash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(construction worker, make money)