electrician: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.66
, mechanic
Weight: 0.64
, construction worker
Weight: 0.63
, craftsman
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.58
Siblings machinist
Weight: 0.37
, carpenter
Weight: 0.37
, office worker
Weight: 0.36
, auto mechanic
Weight: 0.36
, janitor
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
is paid 0.96
offer pay 0.81
is paid poorly 0.80
pay more than others 0.79
get 0.79
offer shit pay 0.79
were paid in egypt 0.79
offer pay with shit hours 0.79
pay monthly 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mechanic, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electrician, get paid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electrician, get paid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electrician, get paid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electrician, get paid)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(worker, were paid in egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electrician, get paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(worker, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(mechanic, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(construction worker, is paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(worker, were paid in egypt)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(worker, were paid in egypt)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, is paid)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(janitor, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mechanic, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(electrician, get paid)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(electrician, get paid)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(electrician, get paid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(electrician, get paid)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(worker, were paid in egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(electrician, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(janitor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(janitor, get paid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(carpenter, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(carpenter, get paid)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(carpenter, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(carpenter, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(electrician, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(electrician, is paid)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(electrician, is paid)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(electrician, is paid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(electrician, is paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electrician, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electrician, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(worker, get paid)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mechanic, get paid)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(worker, were paid in egypt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(carpenter, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(janitor, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(carpenter, is paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(worker, get paid)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mechanic, get paid)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(worker, were paid in egypt)