worker: is paid little

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.66
, person
Weight: 0.63
, poor people
Weight: 0.61
, supervisor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings construction worker
Weight: 0.88
, office worker
Weight: 0.81
, nurse
Weight: 0.71
, janitor
Weight: 0.71
, bus driver
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid little 1.00
get paid little 0.98
get paid less 0.92
get paid 0.90
is paid 0.90
get paid working 0.86
be even are paid 0.86
be are paid 0.85
be paid rate of pay 0.84
be paid in system 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(janitor, get paid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid little)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nurse, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(construction worker, get paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid little)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(nurse, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(nurse, get paid)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(construction worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(construction worker, is paid)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(janitor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(janitor, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(worker, is paid little)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid less)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(worker, get paid less)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(worker, be even are paid)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid working)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(worker, is paid little)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(worker, is paid little)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid little)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(nurse, get paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(janitor, get paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(worker, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)