security guard: is paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents security system
Weight: 0.77
, employee
Weight: 0.69
, police officer
Weight: 0.68
, worker
Weight: 0.68
Siblings bouncer
Weight: 0.47
, prison guard
Weight: 0.37
, state police
Weight: 0.35
, police
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid 1.00
get paid 0.96
is paid little 0.90
get paid little 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(police officer, get paid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(security guard, is paid)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(security guard, is paid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(worker, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(security guard, is paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(worker, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(worker, is paid little)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(police officer, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(police officer, get paid)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(worker, is paid little)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(police officer, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(security guard, is paid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(security guard, is paid)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(worker, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(security guard, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(security guard, is paid)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(security guard, get paid)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(security guard, is paid little)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(security guard, get paid)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(security guard, is paid little)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(security guard, get paid)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(security guard, get paid little)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(security guard, get paid little)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(security guard, is paid little)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(security guard, get paid little)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(security guard, get paid)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(security guard, is paid little)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(security guard, get paid little)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(security guard, is paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(security guard, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(worker, is paid little)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(worker, get paid)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(worker, get paid)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(worker, is paid little)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(security guard, is paid)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, get paid)