security guard: is paid

Related concepts

Parents	security system Weight: 0.77 , employee Weight: 0.69 , police officer Weight: 0.68 , worker Weight: 0.68
Siblings	bouncer Weight: 0.47 , prison guard Weight: 0.37 , state police Weight: 0.35 , police Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is paid	1.00
get paid	0.96
is paid little	0.90
get paid little	0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(police officer, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(security guard, is paid)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(security guard, is paid)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(worker, is paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(security guard, is paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(worker, get paid)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(worker, is paid little)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(police officer, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(police officer, get paid)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(worker, is paid little)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(police officer, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(security guard, is paid)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(security guard, is paid)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(worker, is paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(security guard, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(security guard, is paid)

Similarity expansion

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(security guard, get paid)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(security guard, is paid little)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(security guard, get paid)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(security guard, is paid little)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(security guard, get paid)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(security guard, is paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(security guard, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(worker, is paid little)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(worker, get paid)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(police officer, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(worker, get paid)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(worker, is paid little)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(security guard, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(police officer, get paid)