police officer: get suspended with pay

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents officer
Weight: 0.76
, police
Weight: 0.76
, public servant
Weight: 0.70
, investigator
Weight: 0.58
Siblings police car
Weight: 0.77
, police dog
Weight: 0.73
, security guard
Weight: 0.68
, sergeant
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
get suspended with pay 1.00
be suspended with pay 0.99
get paid leave 0.81
get paid 0.80
be paid 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(officer, get paid)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(police officer, get suspended with pay)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(officer, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(officer, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(security guard, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(officer, get paid)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(police officer, get suspended with pay)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(security guard, get paid)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(security guard, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(police officer, get suspended with pay)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(police officer, be suspended with pay)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(police officer, be suspended with pay)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(police officer, be suspended with pay)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, get paid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be suspended with pay)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(police officer, be paid)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(police officer, get paid)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(police officer, get paid)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(police officer, be paid)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(police officer, be paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(police officer, get paid)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(police officer, get suspended with pay)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(police officer, get suspended with pay)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(officer, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(security guard, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(police officer, get suspended with pay)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(officer, get paid)