discipline: is desirable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents virtue
Weight: 0.66
, trait
Weight: 0.66
, rule
Weight: 0.63
, attribute
Weight: 0.61
, aspect
Weight: 0.61
Siblings ethic
Weight: 0.69
, creativity
Weight: 0.66
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, patience
Weight: 0.62
, academic
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
is desirable 1.00
is attractive 0.84
be desirable in classroom 0.83
attractive in men 0.78
be acceptable for gsl 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(discipline, is desirable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(quality, be acceptable for gsl)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(discipline, is desirable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(quality, attractive in men)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(discipline, is desirable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(quality, attractive in men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(quality, attractive in men)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(discipline, is desirable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(quality, be acceptable for gsl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(quality, be acceptable for gsl)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(discipline, is desirable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(discipline, is desirable)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(discipline, is desirable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(discipline, be desirable in classroom)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(discipline, is desirable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(discipline, be desirable in classroom)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(discipline, is desirable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(discipline, be desirable in classroom)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(discipline, is desirable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(discipline, be desirable in classroom)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(discipline, is desirable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(discipline, is desirable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(discipline, is desirable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(discipline, is desirable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(discipline, is desirable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(discipline, is desirable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(quality, be acceptable for gsl)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(discipline, is desirable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(quality, attractive in men)