discussion: be in circle

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dialogue
Weight: 0.66
, agenda
Weight: 0.63
, community
Weight: 0.63
, plan
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.62
Siblings forum
Weight: 0.67
, lecture
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.34
, meeting
Weight: 0.34
, seminar
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in circle 1.00
be in circle ironic 0.86
be in missionary circle 0.79
be in missionary circle ironic 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(discussion, be in circle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(discussion, be in circle)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(discussion, be in circle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(discussion, be in circle ironic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(discussion, be in circle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be in circle ironic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(discussion, be in circle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(discussion, be in missionary circle)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(discussion, be in circle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(discussion, be in circle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be in missionary circle)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(discussion, be in circle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(discussion, be in circle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(discussion, be in circle ironic)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(discussion, be in circle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(discussion, be in missionary circle)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(discussion, be in circle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(discussion, be in circle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(discussion, be in circle ironic)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(discussion, be in circle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(discussion, be in missionary circle)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(discussion, be in circle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(discussion, be in circle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(discussion, be in circle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be in circle)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(discussion, be in circle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(discussion, be in circle)