discussion: be in missionary circle ironic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dialogue
Weight: 0.66
, agenda
Weight: 0.63
, community
Weight: 0.63
, plan
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.62
Siblings forum
Weight: 0.67
, lecture
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.34
, meeting
Weight: 0.34
, seminar
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in missionary circle ironic 1.00
be in missionary circle 0.94
be in circle ironic 0.86
is ironic 0.77
be important in church 0.77
be in circle 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(community, be important in church)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(community, be important in church)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(community, be important in church)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(topic, is ironic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(community, be important in church)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(topic, is ironic)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(topic, is ironic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(discussion, be in missionary circle)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(discussion, be in missionary circle)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(discussion, be in missionary circle)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(discussion, be in circle ironic)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(discussion, be in circle ironic)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(discussion, be in circle ironic)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(discussion, be in circle)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(discussion, be in circle)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(discussion, be in circle)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be in missionary circle)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be in circle ironic)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be in circle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(community, be important in church)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(topic, is ironic)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(discussion, be in missionary circle ironic)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(community, be important in church)