dish: be at resturant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.60
, utensil
Weight: 0.58
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.78
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.75
, steak
Weight: 0.74
, lasagna
Weight: 0.73
, stew
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at resturant 1.00
be at restaurant 0.85
be serve at steakhouse 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(dish, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(steak, be at resturant)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(dish, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(dish, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at restaurant)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(dish, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(steak, be serve at steakhouse)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dish, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(steak, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(steak, be at resturant)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dish, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dish, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(lasagna, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(lasagna, be at restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dish, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(steak, be serve at steakhouse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(steak, be serve at steakhouse)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dish, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(dish, be at resturant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(dish, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dish, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(dish, be at resturant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dish, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dish, be at resturant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(dish, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lasagna, be at resturant)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(dish, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(steak, be at resturant)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(dish, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(lasagna, be at restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(dish, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(steak, be serve at steakhouse)