lasagna: be at resturant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.73
, food
Weight: 0.69
, entree
Weight: 0.66
, favorite
Weight: 0.62
, meal
Weight: 0.61
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.39
, macaroni
Weight: 0.38
, pasta
Weight: 0.38
, steak
Weight: 0.38
, petri dish
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at resturant 1.00
be at fast-food restaurant 0.85
be at restaurant 0.85
be at in restaurant 0.84
be find in restaurant 0.82
be at italian restaurant 0.79
be serve at restaurant 0.77
be purchase in pizzeria 0.77
be serve in restaurant 0.76
be serve at steakhouse 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(food, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lasagna, be at resturant)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lasagna, be at resturant)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lasagna, be at resturant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lasagna, be at resturant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lasagna, be at resturant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dish, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lasagna, be at resturant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lasagna, be at resturant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(meal, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lasagna, be at resturant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(meal, be serve in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lasagna, be at resturant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dish, be at resturant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(food, be at resturant)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(meal, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(meal, be serve in restaurant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(food, be at resturant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(dish, be at resturant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(meal, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(meal, be serve in restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(food, be serve in restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(steak, be at resturant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pasta, be at restaurant)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pasta, be at italian restaurant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(steak, be serve at steakhouse)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(food, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dish, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(meal, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(meal, be serve in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(steak, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(steak, be at resturant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(pasta, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(pasta, be at restaurant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(pasta, be at italian restaurant)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(pasta, be at italian restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(steak, be serve at steakhouse)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(steak, be serve at steakhouse)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(lasagna, be at resturant)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(lasagna, be at restaurant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(lasagna, be at restaurant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(lasagna, be at restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lasagna, be at resturant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(food, be at resturant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dish, be at resturant)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(meal, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(meal, be serve in restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(steak, be at resturant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(pasta, be at restaurant)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(steak, be serve at steakhouse)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pasta, be at italian restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(food, be at resturant)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(meal, be serve in restaurant)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(meal, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(lasagna, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dish, be at resturant)