food: be at in restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.75
, grocery store
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.66
, fuel
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pet food
Weight: 0.88
, junk food
Weight: 0.74
, fresh food
Weight: 0.74
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.73
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at in restaurant 1.00
be at fast-food restaurant 0.99
be at restaurant 0.99
be find in restaurant 0.95
be at fast food restaurant 0.90
be serve in restaurant 0.90
be serve at restaurant 0.89
be at chain restaurant 0.88
be at resturant 0.84
be at cheap restaurant 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fast food, be at chain restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at chain restaurant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at chain restaurant)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fast food, be at chain restaurant)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(food, be at in restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(food, be at resturant)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(food, be at resturant)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(food, be at resturant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(food, be at restaurant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(food, be at restaurant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(food, be at resturant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fast food, be at chain restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fast food, be at chain restaurant)