dish: be worst company work for

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.60
, utensil
Weight: 0.58
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.78
, potato salad
Weight: 0.76
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.75
, steak
Weight: 0.74
, red cabbage
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be worst company work for 1.00
be worst company work 0.99
be bad company work for 0.88
be bad company work 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dish, be worst company work for)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(dish, be worst company work for)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(dish, be worst company work for)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dish, be worst company work)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dish, be worst company work for)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(dish, be worst company work)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(dish, be worst company work for)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(dish, be worst company work)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(dish, be worst company work for)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dish, be bad company work for)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(dish, be worst company work for)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(dish, be bad company work)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(dish, be worst company work for)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(dish, be bad company work)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dish, be worst company work for)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(dish, be bad company work)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(dish, be worst company work for)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(dish, be bad company work for)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dish, be worst company work for)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(dish, be bad company work for)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(dish, be worst company work for)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(dish, be worst company work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(dish, be worst company work for)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dish, be bad company work)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(dish, be worst company work for)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dish, be bad company work for)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(dish, be worst company work for)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(dish, be worst company work for)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(dish, be worst company work for)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dish, be worst company work for)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(dish, be worst company work for)