dishonesty: has quality definition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, act
Weight: 0.55
, sin
Weight: 0.55
Siblings honesty
Weight: 0.35
, laziness
Weight: 0.35
, selfishness
Weight: 0.34
, stupidity
Weight: 0.34
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality definition 1.00
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(dishonesty, has quality definition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(dishonesty, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(act, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(selfishness, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(honesty, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(dishonesty, has quality definition)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(dishonesty, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(laziness, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(laziness, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(dishonesty, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(selfishness, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(selfishness, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(dishonesty, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(honesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(honesty, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(dishonesty, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(dishonesty, has quality definition)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(dishonesty, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(dishonesty, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(dishonesty, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(dishonesty, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(dishonesty, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(dishonesty, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(dishonesty, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(dishonesty, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality definition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(dishonesty, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(dishonesty, has quality definition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(laziness, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(selfishness, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(honesty, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(dishonesty, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)