disneyland: get more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amusement park
Weight: 0.68
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, vacation
Weight: 0.62
, site
Weight: 0.61
, los angeles
Weight: 0.59
Siblings walt disney world
Weight: 0.36
, las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, san jose
Weight: 0.34
, san diego
Weight: 0.34
, san francisco
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
get more expensive 1.00
get expensive 0.96
be expensive 0.91
is expensive 0.90
be expensive year 0.85
is cheaper 0.84
have expensive houses 0.80
be like jomashop cheap 0.78
actually make money 0.78
be better than disneyland 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amusement park, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(disneyland, get more expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(site, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(disneyland, get more expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(vacation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(disneyland, get more expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(los angeles, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(disneyland, get more expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(site, actually make money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(disneyland, get more expensive)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(vacation, be expensive year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(disneyland, get more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(vacation, be expensive year)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(los angeles, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(vacation, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(amusement park, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(site, is cheaper)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(site, actually make money)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(vacation, be expensive year)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(vacation, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(site, actually make money)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(site, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(walt disney world, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(san diego, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(walt disney world, be better than disneyland)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amusement park, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(vacation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(los angeles, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(site, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(site, actually make money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(vacation, be expensive year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(san francisco, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(san francisco, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(san jose, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(san jose, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(san diego, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(san diego, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(las vegas, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(las vegas, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(walt disney world, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(walt disney world, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(walt disney world, be better than disneyland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(walt disney world, be better than disneyland)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(disneyland, get more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(disneyland, get expensive)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(disneyland, is expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(disneyland, get expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(disneyland, get expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(disneyland, is expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(disneyland, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(disneyland, get more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(vacation, be expensive year)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(los angeles, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(vacation, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(amusement park, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(site, actually make money)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(site, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(walt disney world, be better than disneyland)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(san francisco, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(san jose, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(las vegas, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(san diego, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(walt disney world, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(los angeles, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(vacation, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(amusement park, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(vacation, be expensive year)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(site, is cheaper)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(disneyland, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(site, actually make money)