amusement park: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amusement
Weight: 0.78
, attraction
Weight: 0.72
, site
Weight: 0.67
, location
Weight: 0.66
Siblings roller coaster
Weight: 0.73
, disneyland
Weight: 0.68
, walt disney world
Weight: 0.63
, boardwalk
Weight: 0.60
, magic mountain
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
get expensive 0.94
get more expensive 0.90
is cheaper 0.85
is complicated 0.78
be like jomashop cheap 0.77
cost money 0.77
is selling cheap 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(site, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(amusement park, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(amusement, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(amusement park, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(attraction, is complicated)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(amusement park, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(amusement park, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(amusement, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(site, is cheaper)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(attraction, is complicated)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(site, cost money)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(amusement, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(site, is cheaper)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(site, cost money)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(attraction, is complicated)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(walt disney world, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, get expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(amusement, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(amusement park, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(site, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(amusement park, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(attraction, is complicated)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(amusement park, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(amusement park, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(walt disney world, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(walt disney world, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(disneyland, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(disneyland, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(disneyland, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(disneyland, get expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(disneyland, get more expensive)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(disneyland, get more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(amusement park, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(amusement park, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(amusement, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(site, cost money)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(attraction, is complicated)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(site, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(disneyland, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(walt disney world, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(disneyland, get expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(disneyland, get more expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(amusement, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(site, is cheaper)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(attraction, is complicated)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(site, cost money)