disneyland: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amusement park
Weight: 0.68
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, vacation
Weight: 0.62
, site
Weight: 0.61
, los angeles
Weight: 0.59
Siblings walt disney world
Weight: 0.36
, las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, san jose
Weight: 0.34
, san diego
Weight: 0.34
, san francisco
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
is quality 0.89
has quality right 0.87
be better than world 0.83
has quality worth 0.83
look better 0.81
be better than francisco 0.80
was changed for better 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(site, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(disneyland, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(los angeles, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(disneyland, has quality better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(vacation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(disneyland, has quality better)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(site, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(disneyland, has quality better)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(vacation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(disneyland, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(vacation, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(vacation, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(site, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(los angeles, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(site, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vacation, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(vacation, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(site, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(site, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(walt disney world, was changed for better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(san diego, has quality right)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, look better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(vacation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(disneyland, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(site, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(disneyland, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(los angeles, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(disneyland, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(site, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(disneyland, has quality better)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(vacation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(disneyland, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(san diego, has quality right) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(san diego, has quality right)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(las vegas, look better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(las vegas, look better)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(walt disney world, was changed for better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(walt disney world, was changed for better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(disneyland, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(disneyland, be better than world)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(disneyland, has quality worth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(disneyland, be better than world)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(disneyland, be better than world)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(disneyland, has quality worth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(disneyland, has quality worth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, be better than world)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(disneyland, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(vacation, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(site, is quality)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(vacation, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(los angeles, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(site, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(las vegas, look better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(san diego, has quality right)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(walt disney world, was changed for better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(vacation, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(vacation, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(site, is quality)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(los angeles, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(disneyland, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(site, has quality bad)