disneyland: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amusement park
Weight: 0.68
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, vacation
Weight: 0.62
, site
Weight: 0.61
, los angeles
Weight: 0.59
Siblings walt disney world
Weight: 0.36
, las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, san jose
Weight: 0.34
, san diego
Weight: 0.34
, san francisco
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality good 0.85
is quality 0.83
has quality better 0.83
has quality bad 0.82
has quality right 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(site, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(disneyland, has quality worth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(los angeles, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(disneyland, has quality worth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(vacation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(disneyland, has quality worth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(site, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(disneyland, has quality worth)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(vacation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(disneyland, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(vacation, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(vacation, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(site, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(los angeles, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(site, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vacation, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(vacation, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(site, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(site, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(san diego, has quality right)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(vacation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(disneyland, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(site, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(disneyland, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(site, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(disneyland, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(los angeles, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(disneyland, has quality worth)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(vacation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(disneyland, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(san diego, has quality right) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(san diego, has quality right)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(disneyland, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(disneyland, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(disneyland, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(disneyland, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(disneyland, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(vacation, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(site, is quality)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(vacation, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(los angeles, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(site, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(san diego, has quality right)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(vacation, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(site, is quality)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(vacation, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(los angeles, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(disneyland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(site, has quality bad)