display: have latency

Related concepts

Parents	exhibit Weight: 0.69 , behavior Weight: 0.63 , field Weight: 0.62 , signal Weight: 0.60
Siblings	exhibition Weight: 0.64 , performance Weight: 0.63 , screen Weight: 0.62 , touchscreen Weight: 0.61 , crt Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have latency	1.00
has latency	1.00
have terrible latency	0.97
require bandwidth	0.79
require more bandwidth	0.78
produce bandwidth	0.78
produce greater bandwidth	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(signal, require more bandwidth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(display, have latency)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(signal, produce greater bandwidth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(display, have latency)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(signal, produce bandwidth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(display, have latency)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(signal, produce bandwidth)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(signal, require more bandwidth)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(signal, produce greater bandwidth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(signal, require more bandwidth)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(signal, produce greater bandwidth)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(signal, produce bandwidth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(signal, require more bandwidth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(display, have latency)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(signal, produce greater bandwidth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(display, have latency)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(signal, produce bandwidth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(display, have latency)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(display, have latency)

Similarity expansion

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(display, have terrible latency)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(display, have terrible latency)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.42

Salient(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Salient(display, have terrible latency)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(display, have terrible latency)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Salient(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(display, have latency)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(display, have latency)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(signal, produce bandwidth)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(signal, require more bandwidth)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(signal, produce greater bandwidth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(signal, produce bandwidth)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(signal, produce greater bandwidth)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(display, have latency) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(signal, require more bandwidth)