distribution: be important for marketing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.66
, transfer
Weight: 0.62
, industry
Weight: 0.61
, quantity
Weight: 0.61
Siblings fedora
Weight: 0.51
, median
Weight: 0.50
, binomial
Weight: 0.50
, caldera
Weight: 0.42
, rollover
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for marketing 1.00
be important for successful marketing 0.95
be important in marketing mix 0.91
be important to business 0.80
be important in business 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operation, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(distribution, be important for marketing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(operation, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(distribution, be important for marketing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(operation, be important to business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(operation, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important to business)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operation, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(distribution, be important for marketing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(operation, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(distribution, be important for marketing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(distribution, be important for marketing)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(distribution, be important for successful marketing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(distribution, be important in marketing mix)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(distribution, be important for successful marketing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(distribution, be important in marketing mix)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(distribution, be important in marketing mix)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(distribution, be important for successful marketing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(distribution, be important in marketing mix)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(distribution, be important for successful marketing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(distribution, be important for marketing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(distribution, be important for marketing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(operation, be important to business)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(operation, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(operation, be important to business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(operation, be important in business)