operation: be important in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.62
, functional group
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.60
Siblings operating system
Weight: 0.73
, raid
Weight: 0.72
, extraction
Weight: 0.66
, distribution
Weight: 0.66
, business activity
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in business 1.00
be important to business 0.99
be like kmart in business 0.83
be important for successful marketing 0.82
be important for marketing 0.80
be important in marketing 0.80
be important in banking 0.77
be important in society 0.77
be vital component of tourism 0.76
be important in marketing mix 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(place, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(operation, be important in business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(place, be vital component of tourism)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(operation, be important in business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(facility, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(operation, be important in business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(facility, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(place, be important in marketing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(place, be vital component of tourism)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(facility, be important in business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(place, be vital component of tourism)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(place, be important in marketing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(distribution, be important for successful marketing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(distribution, be important for marketing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(distribution, be important in marketing mix)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(business activity, be important in society)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(facility, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(operation, be important in business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(place, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(operation, be important in business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(place, be vital component of tourism)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(operation, be important in business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(distribution, be important for marketing)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(distribution, be important for marketing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(distribution, be important for successful marketing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(distribution, be important for successful marketing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(business activity, be important in society)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(business activity, be important in society)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(distribution, be important in marketing mix)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(distribution, be important in marketing mix)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(operation, be important in business)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(operation, be important to business)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(operation, be important to business)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(operation, be important to business)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important to business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(operation, be important in banking)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(operation, be important in banking)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(operation, be important in banking)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in banking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(operation, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(facility, be important in business)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(place, be important in marketing)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(place, be vital component of tourism)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(business activity, be important in society)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(distribution, be important for marketing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(distribution, be important in marketing mix)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(distribution, be important for successful marketing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(facility, be important in business)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(place, be important in marketing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(place, be vital component of tourism)