operation: be important in banking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.62
, functional group
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.60
Siblings operating system
Weight: 0.73
, raid
Weight: 0.72
, extraction
Weight: 0.66
, distribution
Weight: 0.66
, business activity
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in banking 1.00
be important in business 0.77
be important to business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(facility, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(operation, be important in banking)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(operation, be important in banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(facility, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(facility, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(facility, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(operation, be important in banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(operation, be important in banking)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(operation, be important in banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(operation, be important in banking)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(operation, be important in banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(operation, be important in business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(operation, be important in banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(operation, be important to business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(operation, be important in banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(operation, be important in business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(operation, be important in banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(operation, be important to business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(operation, be important in banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(operation, be important in business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(operation, be important in banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(operation, be important to business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(operation, be important in banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important to business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(operation, be important in banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(operation, be important in banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(operation, be important in banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in banking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(operation, be important in banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(operation, be important in banking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(facility, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(operation, be important in banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(facility, be important in business)