district: is sizes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents school district
Weight: 0.84
, town
Weight: 0.72
, state
Weight: 0.68
, region
Weight: 0.62
Siblings high school
Weight: 0.71
, kolkata
Weight: 0.45
, galilee
Weight: 0.43
, karachi
Weight: 0.41
, lucknow
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
is sizes 1.00
have sizes 0.99
is different sizes 0.97
have different sizes 0.96
vary in size 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(region, vary in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(district, is sizes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(region, vary in size)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(region, vary in size)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(region, vary in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(district, is sizes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(district, is sizes)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(district, have sizes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(district, have sizes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(district, is different sizes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(district, have different sizes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(district, have different sizes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(district, is different sizes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(district, is different sizes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(district, have sizes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(district, have different sizes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(district, is different sizes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(district, have different sizes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(district, have sizes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(district, vary in size)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(district, vary in size)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(district, vary in size)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(district, vary in size)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(district, is sizes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(district, is sizes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(region, vary in size)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(district, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(region, vary in size)