documentary: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents television show
Weight: 0.63
, scene
Weight: 0.63
, show
Weight: 0.60
, book
Weight: 0.59
Siblings blackfish
Weight: 0.41
, autobiography
Weight: 0.34
, biography
Weight: 0.33
, talk show
Weight: 0.33
, television
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality good 0.85
has quality bad 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(book, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(documentary, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(book, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(book, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talk show, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(television, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(autobiography, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(biography, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(television, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(book, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(documentary, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(television, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(biography, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(biography, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(talk show, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(talk show, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(autobiography, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(autobiography, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(television, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(television, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(documentary, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(documentary, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(documentary, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(documentary, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(documentary, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(documentary, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(documentary, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(documentary, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(documentary, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(documentary, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(documentary, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(book, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(talk show, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(autobiography, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(television, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(biography, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(television, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(documentary, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(book, has quality good)