doe: be sexual partner

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.57
, time
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, activity
Weight: 0.51
, issue
Weight: 0.51
Siblings antler
Weight: 0.33
, elderly person
Weight: 0.32
, homeless person
Weight: 0.32
, dead person
Weight: 0.32
, creature
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be sexual partner 1.00
be sexual 0.90
be harassing sexual partner 0.87
be partner 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(doe, be sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(doe, be sexual partner)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(doe, be sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(doe, be sexual)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(doe, be sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(doe, be sexual)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(doe, be sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(doe, be sexual)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(doe, be sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(doe, be harassing sexual partner)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(doe, be sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(doe, be harassing sexual partner)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(doe, be sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(doe, be harassing sexual partner)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(doe, be sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(doe, be partner)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(doe, be sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(doe, be partner)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(doe, be sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(doe, be partner)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(doe, be sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(doe, be harassing sexual partner)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(doe, be sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(doe, be partner)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(doe, be sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(doe, be sexual)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(doe, be sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(doe, be sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(doe, be sexual partner)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(doe, be sexual partner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(doe, be sexual partner)