dog food: be bad for deer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.68
, item
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.65
Siblings dog
Weight: 0.42
, pet
Weight: 0.38
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for deer 1.00
be bad for cats 0.79
be bad for dogs 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(dog food, be bad for deer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(dog food, be bad for deer)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(dog food, be bad for deer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(dog food, be bad for cats)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(dog food, be bad for deer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(dog food, be bad for cats)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(dog food, be bad for deer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be bad for cats)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(dog food, be bad for deer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(dog food, be bad for cats)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(dog food, be bad for deer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be bad for dogs)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(dog food, be bad for deer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(dog food, be bad for dogs)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(dog food, be bad for deer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(dog food, be bad for dogs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(dog food, be bad for deer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(dog food, be bad for dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(dog food, be bad for deer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(dog food, be bad for deer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be bad for deer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(dog food, be bad for deer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(dog food, be bad for deer)