dog food: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.68
, item
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.65
Siblings dog
Weight: 0.42
, pet
Weight: 0.38
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
be good for dogs 0.97
be bad for cats 0.92
be made for dogs 0.91
be different from cat food 0.82
be bad for humans 0.81
be cheaper than cat food 0.79
be bad for deer 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(dog food, be bad for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(dog food, be bad for cats)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(dog food, be bad for cats)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be bad for cats)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(dog food, be bad for cats)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(dog food, be made for dogs)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dog food, be good for dogs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(dog food, be made for dogs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(dog food, be good for dogs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(dog food, be different from cat food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(dog food, be different from cat food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(dog food, be made for dogs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be different from cat food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(dog food, be different from cat food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(dog food, be good for dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(dog food, be bad for humans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(dog food, be cheaper than cat food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(dog food, be cheaper than cat food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(dog food, be bad for deer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(dog food, be bad for deer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be bad for deer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be cheaper than cat food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(dog food, be bad for humans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(dog food, be cheaper than cat food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(dog food, be bad for deer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(dog food, be bad for humans)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be bad for humans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be good for dogs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be made for dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(dog food, be bad for dogs)