dog food: be cheaper than cat food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.68
, item
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.65
Siblings dog
Weight: 0.42
, pet
Weight: 0.38
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than cat food 1.00
be different from cat food 0.91
be better than people food 0.85
be bad for cats 0.83
have different food 0.80
have food 0.80
be good for dogs 0.79
be bad for dogs 0.79
be made for dogs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(dog food, be cheaper than cat food)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(dog food, be different from cat food)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(dog food, be different from cat food)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be different from cat food)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(dog food, be different from cat food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(dog food, be bad for cats)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(dog food, be bad for cats)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be bad for cats)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(dog food, have different food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(dog food, have food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(dog food, be bad for cats)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dog food, have food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(dog food, have different food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(dog food, be made for dogs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(dog food, be better than people food)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(dog food, be made for dogs)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(dog food, have food)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(dog food, have different food)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be bad for dogs)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dog food, be good for dogs)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(dog food, be better than people food)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(dog food, be bad for dogs)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(dog food, be made for dogs)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be good for dogs)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(dog food, be bad for dogs)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be better than people food)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(dog food, be better than people food)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(dog food, be good for dogs)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(dog food, be bad for dogs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be made for dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(dog food, be good for dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(dog food, have different food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(dog food, have food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be cheaper than cat food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dog food, be cheaper than cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(dog food, be cheaper than cat food)