dog poop: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.63
, problem
Weight: 0.56
Siblings poop
Weight: 0.37
, dog food
Weight: 0.37
, puppy
Weight: 0.36
, beagle
Weight: 0.35
, animal fat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
affect environment 0.87
has quality bad 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dog poop, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(animal fat, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dog poop, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dog food, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dog poop, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(poop, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dog poop, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(animal fat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(animal fat, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dog poop, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(poop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(poop, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dog poop, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(dog food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(dog food, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dog poop, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(dog poop, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(dog poop, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(dog poop, affect environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(dog poop, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(dog poop, affect environment)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dog poop, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(dog poop, affect environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(dog poop, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(dog poop, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(dog poop, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dog poop, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dog poop, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(dog poop, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dog poop, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(dog poop, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dog poop, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(dog poop, affect environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(dog poop, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(dog poop, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dog poop, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dog poop, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(dog poop, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dog poop, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(animal fat, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dog poop, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(poop, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dog poop, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(dog food, has quality bad)