dog: be very smart

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pet food
Weight: 0.73
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, mammal
Weight: 0.70
, pet
Weight: 0.69
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.83
, small dog
Weight: 0.81
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.81
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.80
, police dog
Weight: 0.76

Related properties

Property Similarity
be very smart 1.00
be very smart and obedient 0.86
be less smart than human 0.83
be intelligent 0.81
be more intelligent than most human know 0.80
be very good at their job 0.79
has very good hear 0.78
be think to be very loyal 0.77
appear intelligent 0.77
be very playful and friendly 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dog, be very smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(police dog, be intelligent)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dog, be very smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(police dog, be very good at their job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dog, be very smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(police dog, be very good at their job)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dog, be very smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(police dog, be intelligent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(police dog, be intelligent)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dog, be very smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(dog, be very smart)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(dog, be very smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(dog, be very playful and friendly)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dog, be very smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(dog, be very playful and friendly)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(dog, be very smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(dog, be very playful and friendly)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(dog, be very smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dog, be very playful and friendly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(dog, be very smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dog, be very smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dog, be very smart)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dog, be very smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dog, be very smart)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dog, be very smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(police dog, be intelligent)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dog, be very smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(police dog, be very good at their job)