police dog: be very good at their job

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.76
, animal
Weight: 0.74
, police officer
Weight: 0.73
, police
Weight: 0.68
, security
Weight: 0.57
Siblings small dog
Weight: 0.41
, police car
Weight: 0.40
, beagle
Weight: 0.39
, rottweiler
Weight: 0.39
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be very good at their job 1.00
be good 0.85
has very good hear 0.83
has feel too 0.79
be at good hand 0.79
do many thing 0.79
be very smart 0.79
make angry man feel good 0.78
be think to be very loyal 0.78
be at it kenel 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(dog, do many thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(police dog, be very good at their job)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(animal, has feel too) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(police dog, be very good at their job)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(animal, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(police dog, be very good at their job)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dog, be very smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(police dog, be very good at their job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(animal, be good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dog, be very smart)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(animal, has feel too)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(dog, do many thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(animal, be good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dog, be very smart)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(animal, has feel too)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(dog, do many thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be at good hand)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be at it kenel)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(animal, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(police dog, be very good at their job)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(dog, do many thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(police dog, be very good at their job)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(animal, has feel too) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(police dog, be very good at their job)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dog, be very smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(police dog, be very good at their job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(small dog, be at it kenel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(small dog, be at it kenel)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(small dog, be at good hand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(small dog, be at good hand)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(police dog, be very good at their job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(police dog, be very good at their job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(police dog, be very good at their job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(dog, do many thing)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(animal, has feel too)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(animal, be good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dog, be very smart)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(small dog, be at it kenel)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(small dog, be at good hand)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(dog, do many thing)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(animal, has feel too)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(animal, be good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(police dog, be very good at their job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dog, be very smart)