dog: has physical part nose

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.70
, pet
Weight: 0.69
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.83
, small dog
Weight: 0.81
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.81
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.80
, dachshund
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part nose 1.00
has nose 0.93
get nose 0.90
has nose look 0.90
has physical part noses 0.89
has nose run 0.89
has physical part ears 0.86
nose food 0.85
have wet nose 0.84
get wet nose 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part nose)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part ears)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part nose)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has physical part ears)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part nose)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part ears)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part nose)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(beagle, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(beagle, has physical part ears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part nose)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(dog, has physical part nose)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(dog, has physical part nose)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(dog, has physical part ears)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part nose)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part ears)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(dog, has physical part nose)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part ears)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(dog, has physical part nose)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(dog, has physical part nose)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part nose)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part nose)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part nose)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part nose)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part nose)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part ears)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part nose)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(beagle, has physical part ears)