domain: has state case

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.64
, web site
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, asset
Weight: 0.55
Siblings domain name
Weight: 0.76
, web browser
Weight: 0.34
, filename
Weight: 0.34
, web
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state case 1.00
is kelo case 0.94
is lower case 0.84
has state name 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, has state case)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has state case)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, has state case)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is lower case)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(domain, has state case)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(domain name, has state case)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(domain name, has state case)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(domain, has state case)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(domain name, is lower case)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(domain name, is lower case)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(domain, has state case)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(domain, has state case)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(domain, has state case)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(domain, is kelo case)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(domain, has state case)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(domain, is kelo case)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(domain, has state case)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(domain, is kelo case)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(domain, has state case)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(domain, is kelo case)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(domain, has state case)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(domain, has state name)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(domain, has state case)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(domain, has state name)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(domain, has state case)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(domain, has state name)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(domain, has state case)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(domain, has state name)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(domain, has state case)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(domain, has state case)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, has state case)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(domain, has state case)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(domain, has state case)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, has state case)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(domain name, has state case)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, has state case)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(domain name, is lower case)