domain: has state name

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.64
, web site
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, asset
Weight: 0.55
Siblings domain name
Weight: 0.76
, web browser
Weight: 0.34
, filename
Weight: 0.34
, web
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state name 1.00
has state names 0.92
has state case 0.76
become league names 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(domain, has state name)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(domain name, become league names)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(domain, has state name)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has state case)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(domain, has state name)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(domain name, has state case)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(domain name, has state case)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(domain, has state name)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(domain name, become league names)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(domain name, become league names)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(domain, has state name)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(domain, has state name)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(domain, has state name)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(domain, has state names)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(domain, has state name)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(domain, has state names)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(domain, has state name)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(domain, has state names)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(domain, has state name)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(domain, has state names)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(domain, has state name)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(domain, has state case)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(domain, has state name)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(domain, has state case)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(domain, has state name)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(domain, has state case)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(domain, has state name)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, has state case)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(domain, has state name)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(domain, has state name)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(domain, has state name)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(domain, has state name)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(domain, has state name)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(domain, has state name)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(domain name, has state case)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(domain, has state name)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(domain name, become league names)