domain: has state names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.64
, web site
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, asset
Weight: 0.55
Siblings domain name
Weight: 0.76
, web browser
Weight: 0.34
, filename
Weight: 0.34
, web
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state names 1.00
has state name 0.92
become league names 0.82
become available league names 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(domain, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(domain name, become league names)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(domain, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(domain name, become available league names)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(domain, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(domain name, become available league names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(domain name, become available league names)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(domain, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(domain name, become league names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(domain name, become league names)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(domain, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(domain, has state names)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(domain, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(domain, has state name)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(domain, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(domain, has state name)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(domain, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(domain, has state name)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(domain, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(domain, has state name)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(domain, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(domain, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(domain, has state names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(domain, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(domain, has state names)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(domain, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(domain name, become available league names)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(domain, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(domain name, become league names)