donkey: be put in fields with cows

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents horse
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.60
, equine
Weight: 0.55
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.37
, goat
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.36
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.36
, reindeer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be put in fields with cows 1.00
be put with cows 0.92
be with cows 0.90
live with cows 0.88
be in pastures with cows 0.87
protect cows 0.84
be in cow pastures 0.84
be kept with cattle 0.82
be put with horses 0.81
be kept with sheep 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(llama, protect cows)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(llama, be kept with sheep)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(llama, protect cows)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(llama, protect cows)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(llama, be kept with sheep)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(llama, be kept with sheep)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(donkey, be put in fields with cows)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(donkey, be with cows)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(donkey, be with cows)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(donkey, be with cows)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(donkey, be kept with cattle)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(donkey, be kept with sheep)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(donkey, be kept with sheep)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(donkey, be kept with cattle)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(donkey, be kept with sheep)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(donkey, be kept with cattle)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(donkey, be with cows)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(donkey, be put with horses)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(donkey, be put with horses)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(donkey, be put with horses)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(donkey, be kept with sheep)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(donkey, be kept with cattle)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(donkey, be put with horses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(donkey, be put in fields with cows)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(donkey, be put in fields with cows)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(llama, protect cows)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(llama, be kept with sheep)