door: be at lock in large structure

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents doorway
Weight: 0.65
, window
Weight: 0.64
, bedroom
Weight: 0.63
, way
Weight: 0.61
Siblings front door
Weight: 0.87
, refrigerator
Weight: 0.70
, gate
Weight: 0.62
, trunk
Weight: 0.60
, closet
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at lock in large structure 1.00
be at lock in house 0.86
be at lock in build 0.86
be at lock in most build 0.85
be used to lock 0.84
be at lock in city 0.84
be lock 0.84
be at lock in office build 0.84
be at lock in home 0.84
be at lock in almost any build 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(door, be at lock in large structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(gate, be lock)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(door, be at lock in large structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(gate, be used to lock)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(door, be at lock in large structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(gate, be used to lock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(gate, be used to lock)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(door, be at lock in large structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(gate, be lock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(gate, be lock)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(door, be at lock in large structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(door, be at lock in large structure)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(door, be at lock in large structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(door, be at lock in house)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(door, be at lock in large structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(door, be at lock in build)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(door, be at lock in large structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(door, be at lock in house)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(door, be at lock in large structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(door, be at lock in build)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(door, be at lock in large structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(door, be at lock in almost any build)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(door, be at lock in large structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(door, be at lock in large structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(door, be at lock in large structure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(door, be at lock in large structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(door, be at lock in large structure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(door, be at lock in large structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(gate, be lock)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(door, be at lock in large structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(gate, be used to lock)