doormat: be at florida

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.46
, home
Weight: 0.39
, product
Weight: 0.38
, rug
Weight: 0.36
Siblings trash bag
Weight: 0.30
, bed sheet
Weight: 0.30
, cardboard box
Weight: 0.30
, tablecloth
Weight: 0.30
, toilet bowl
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at florida 1.00
be at michigan 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(home, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(doormat, be at florida)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(doormat, be at florida)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(home, be at michigan)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(doormat, be at florida)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(home, be at michigan)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(home, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(doormat, be at florida)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(doormat, be at florida)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(doormat, be at florida)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(doormat, be at florida)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(doormat, be at florida)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(doormat, be at florida)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(doormat, be at florida)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(doormat, be at florida)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(doormat, be at florida)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(doormat, be at florida)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(home, be at michigan)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(doormat, be at florida)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(home, be at michigan)