draft: is abolished

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.65
, option
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.56
, proposal
Weight: 0.56
Siblings typescript
Weight: 0.46
, amendment
Weight: 0.32
, declaration
Weight: 0.32
, blueprint
Weight: 0.32
, manuscript
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is abolished 1.00
be repealed 0.85
is repealed 0.85
is is repealed 0.85
was repealed 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(draft, is abolished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(amendment, be repealed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(draft, is abolished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(amendment, is repealed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(draft, is abolished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(amendment, is is repealed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(draft, is abolished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amendment, was repealed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(draft, is abolished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(amendment, was repealed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(draft, is abolished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(amendment, is is repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(amendment, is is repealed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(draft, is abolished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(amendment, is repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(amendment, is repealed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(draft, is abolished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(amendment, be repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(amendment, be repealed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(draft, is abolished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(draft, is abolished)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(draft, is abolished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(draft, is abolished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(draft, is abolished)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(draft, is abolished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(draft, is abolished)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(draft, is abolished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(amendment, was repealed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(draft, is abolished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(amendment, is repealed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(draft, is abolished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(amendment, be repealed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(draft, is abolished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(amendment, is is repealed)