drinking: be in public illegal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents indulgence
Weight: 0.61
, need
Weight: 0.59
, vice
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings bottled water
Weight: 0.66
, wine
Weight: 0.32
, thirst
Weight: 0.32
, chocolate
Weight: 0.31
, temperance
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in public illegal 1.00
is illegal 0.91
be illegal in california 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vice, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(drinking, be in public illegal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(drinking, be in public illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(vice, is illegal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(drinking, be in public illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(vice, is illegal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vice, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(drinking, be in public illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(drinking, be in public illegal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(drinking, be in public illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(drinking, be in public illegal)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(drinking, be in public illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(drinking, is illegal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(drinking, be in public illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(drinking, is illegal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(drinking, be in public illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(drinking, is illegal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(drinking, be in public illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(drinking, is illegal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(drinking, be in public illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(drinking, be illegal in california)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(drinking, be in public illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(drinking, be in public illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(drinking, be in public illegal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(drinking, be in public illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(drinking, be in public illegal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(drinking, be in public illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(vice, is illegal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(drinking, be in public illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(vice, is illegal)